Intra-Action Review of Sierra Leone’s 2025 Mpox Outbreak Response: Insights for Advancing Decentralized Public Health Systems

Authors

  • Mohamed Boie Jalloh Directorate of Planning, Police and Research, National Public Health Agency, Free town, Sierra Leone
  • Abdulai Alpha Jalloh Directorate of Planning, Police and Research, National Public Health Agency, Free town, Sierra Leone
  • Mohamed Alex Vandi National Public Health Agency, Free town, Sierra Leone
  • Mustapha Jalloh Directorate of Surveillance and Epidemiology, National Public Health Agency, Free town Sierra Leone
  • James Sylvester Squire Directorate of Surveillance and Epidemiology, National Public Health Agency, Free town Sierra Leone
  • Ibrahim Kamara Directorate of Planning, Police and Research, National Public Health Agency, Free town, Sierra Leone
  • Laurine Chikodiri Nwosu Department of Business Administration, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey
  • Alhaji U. N'jai Department of Biological Sciences, Fourah Bay College, University of Sierra Leone
  • Foday Sahr National Public Health Agency, Free town, Sierra Leone

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4314.3.5

Abstract

In complying with the International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (IHR-MEF), the National Public Health Agency (NPHA) mounted a phased Intra-Action Review (IAR), beginning at the regional level and proceeding to the national level, to assess response activities, identify best practices, and recommend corrective actions. The paper aims to report on Sierra Leone’s decentralized response to the 2025 mpox outbreak through the lens of a structured IAR process. The IAR employed an interactive approach, using a user-friendly approach and systematic facilitation techniques. The focus was not on the individual performance of the mpox response but rather on the health system's overall performance.

The IAR revealed that operationalization of the Incident Management System, decentralization of response structures, and engagement of community and partner institutions strengthened response capacity across districts. These approaches contributed to improved coordination, expanded access to services, and enhanced collaboration among stakeholders at national and subnational levels. At the same time, the review shows persistent systemic weaknesses that limited operational efficiency. Delays in funding disbursement, logistical constraints, data management challenges, and gaps in community engagement affected the timeliness and consistency of interventions.

Improving emergency preparedness requires more efficient and reliable financing systems so that response activities can begin quickly at both the national and district levels. Funds should be released on time, and districts should have greater control over resources. This will improve response speed and reduce delays in carrying out important interventions.

Keywords: Intra Action Review (IAR); Incident management system; Incident Action Plan (IAP); mpox

 

Downloads

Published

2026-06-12

Issue

Section

Original Articles